FCUV vs TXT: Correlation
Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) and Textron (TXT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FCUV and TXT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FCUV and TXT correlate at -0.19, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.40) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.19). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.09, with an annualized covariance of -1400.2 %².
Among the 33 assets we track against FCUV, TXT ranks #18 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TXT ahead by 86.5 points (-85.8% versus +0.7%). One caveat on sizing: FCUV is 11.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FCUV vs TXT: side by side
| FCUV (Focus Universal Inc.) | TXT (Textron) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -85.8% | +0.7% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | +15.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 287.5% | 25.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 0.89 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.8% | -37.3% |
| Market cap | – | $14.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 15.7 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Industrials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FCUV | TXT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.7% | -8.2% |
| 2023 | -65.8% | +13.7% |
| 2024 | -76.0% | -4.8% |
| 2025 | -76.9% | +14.1% |
| 2026 | -67.8% | -5.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FCUV and TXT good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FCUV and TXT?
The FCUV/TXT correlation stands at -0.19 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.40, 5 years: -0.09), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is TXT a good diversifier for FCUV?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcuv-vs-txt.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcuv-vs-txt/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FCUV correlations · TXT correlations
