FCUV vs MNST: Correlation
Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) and Monster Beverage (MNST) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.40.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FCUV and MNST?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FCUV and MNST correlate at -0.40, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.49) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.36, with an annualized covariance of -7912.6 %².
MNST is close to the least connected end of FCUV's tracked universe, ranking #32 of 33. The last year tells two different stories: MNST led by 61.5 percentage points, -85.8% for FCUV against -24.3% for MNST. One caveat on sizing: FCUV is 4.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FCUV vs MNST: side by side
| FCUV (Focus Universal Inc.) | MNST (Monster Beverage) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -85.8% | -24.3% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -4.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 287.5% | 68.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 0.80 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.8% | -54.5% |
| Market cap | – | $91.5B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 43.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Consumer Staples |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FCUV | MNST |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.7% | +5.7% |
| 2023 | -65.8% | +13.5% |
| 2024 | -76.0% | -8.8% |
| 2025 | -76.9% | +45.9% |
| 2026 | -67.8% | -39.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FCUV and MNST good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FCUV and MNST?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FCUV and MNST is -0.40 over 3 years, -0.49 over 1 year and -0.36 over 5 years.
Is MNST a good diversifier for FCUV?
Yes: at -0.40, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.40 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcuv-vs-mnst.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcuv-vs-mnst/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FCUV correlations · MNST correlations
