FCUV vs MKZR: Correlation
Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) and MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (MKZR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.35.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FCUV and MKZR?
Over the past 3 years, FCUV and MKZR moved with a correlation of -0.35, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.42 over 1 year against -0.35 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -10715.7 %².
MKZR is close to the least connected end of FCUV's tracked universe, ranking #31 of 33. On 12-month performance MKZR holds a 10.1-point edge, -85.8% against -75.7%. Risk is not evenly split, since FCUV carries 3.1 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FCUV vs MKZR: side by side
| FCUV (Focus Universal Inc.) | MKZR (MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -85.8% | -75.7% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 287.5% | 91.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 0.74 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.8% | -97.8% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FCUV | MKZR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.7% | – |
| 2023 | -65.8% | – |
| 2024 | -76.0% | – |
| 2025 | -76.9% | -86.7% |
| 2026 | -67.8% | -63.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FCUV and MKZR good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, FCUV and MKZR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FCUV and MKZR?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.35 over 3 years, with -0.42 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is MKZR a good diversifier for FCUV?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.35, FCUV and MKZR have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.35 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcuv-vs-mkzr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcuv-vs-mkzr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FCUV correlations · MKZR correlations
