FCUV vs MBAI: Correlation
How closely do Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) and Check-Cap Ltd. (MBAI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.63, which is strong.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FCUV and MBAI?
Over the past 3 years, FCUV and MBAI moved with a correlation of 0.63, which is strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.68 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.60, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 86069.4 %².
Within FCUV's tracked universe of 33 assets, MBAI comes in at #6 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: MBAI led by 996.6 percentage points, -85.8% for FCUV against +910.8% for MBAI. Risk is not evenly split, since MBAI carries 1.7 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FCUV vs MBAI: side by side
| FCUV (Focus Universal Inc.) | MBAI (Check-Cap Ltd.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -85.8% | +910.8% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -69.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 287.5% | 474.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 1.76 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.8% | -87.3% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 1.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FCUV | MBAI |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.7% | -83.7% |
| 2023 | -65.8% | -5.5% |
| 2024 | -76.0% | -52.4% |
| 2025 | -76.9% | +63.6% |
| 2026 | -67.8% | +305.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FCUV and MBAI good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.63 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FCUV and MBAI?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.63 over 3 years, with 0.68 over the last year and 0.60 over 5 years.
Is MBAI a good diversifier for FCUV?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.63 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.63 mean?
A reading of 0.63 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcuv-vs-mbai.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcuv-vs-mbai/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FCUV correlations · MBAI correlations
