FCUV vs RBLX: Correlation
How closely do Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FCUV and RBLX?
Over the past 3 years, FCUV and RBLX moved with a correlation of -0.25, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.38 versus -0.25 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.10, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -3897.8 %².
Within FCUV's tracked universe of 33 assets, RBLX comes in at #23 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RBLX outperformed by 16.9 percentage points (-85.8% for FCUV against -68.9% for RBLX). Note the risk asymmetry: FCUV runs 5.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FCUV vs RBLX: side by side
| FCUV (Focus Universal Inc.) | RBLX (Roblox Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -85.8% | -68.9% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | -53.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 287.5% | 54.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 1.26 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.8% | -74.9% |
| Market cap | – | $27.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FCUV | RBLX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.7% | -72.4% |
| 2023 | -65.8% | +60.6% |
| 2024 | -76.0% | +26.6% |
| 2025 | -76.9% | +40.0% |
| 2026 | -67.8% | -52.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FCUV and RBLX good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FCUV and RBLX?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FCUV and RBLX is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.38 over 1 year and -0.10 over 5 years.
Is RBLX a good diversifier for FCUV?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.25 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcuv-vs-rblx.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcuv-vs-rblx/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FCUV correlations · RBLX correlations
