FCUV vs PSN: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) and Parsons Corporation (PSN) carry a correlation of -0.33, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FCUV and PSN?
On 3 years of weekly data the FCUV/PSN correlation comes out at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.46) than the 3-year average (-0.33). The 5-year figure is -0.26, and annualized covariance runs at -3727.5 %².
Out of 33 assets tracked against FCUV, PSN lands near the bottom at #29. The last year tells two different stories: PSN led by 47.1 percentage points, -85.8% for FCUV against -38.7% for PSN. Risk is not evenly split, since FCUV carries 7.3 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FCUV vs PSN: side by side
| FCUV (Focus Universal Inc.) | PSN (Parsons Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -85.8% | -38.7% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | +38.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 287.5% | 39.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 0.82 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.8% | -64.4% |
| Market cap | – | $5.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 34.0 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FCUV | PSN |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.7% | +37.4% |
| 2023 | -65.8% | +35.6% |
| 2024 | -76.0% | +47.1% |
| 2025 | -76.9% | -33.0% |
| 2026 | -67.8% | -20.3% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FCUV and PSN good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FCUV and PSN?
The FCUV/PSN correlation stands at -0.33 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.46, 5 years: -0.26), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is PSN a good diversifier for FCUV?
Yes: at -0.33, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.33 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcuv-vs-psn.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcuv-vs-psn/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FCUV correlations · PSN correlations
