FCUV vs LHX: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) and L3Harris (LHX) carry a correlation of -0.20, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are FCUV and LHX?
On 3 years of weekly data the FCUV/LHX correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.32) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.20). The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -1333.6 %².
Among the 33 assets we track against FCUV, LHX ranks #19 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: LHX led by 82.0 percentage points, -85.8% for FCUV against -3.8% for LHX. Note the risk asymmetry: FCUV runs 12.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
FCUV vs LHX: side by side
| FCUV (Focus Universal Inc.) | LHX (L3Harris) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -85.8% | -3.8% |
| 5-year return | -99.4% | +24.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 287.5% | 23.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.68 | 0.51 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.8% | -30.3% |
| Market cap | – | $48.8B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 26.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Industrials |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | FCUV | LHX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.7% | -0.5% |
| 2023 | -65.8% | +3.7% |
| 2024 | -76.0% | +1.9% |
| 2025 | -76.9% | +42.3% |
| 2026 | -67.8% | -10.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are FCUV and LHX good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between FCUV and LHX?
The FCUV/LHX correlation stands at -0.20 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.32, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is LHX a good diversifier for FCUV?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.20 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fcuv-vs-lhx.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fcuv-vs-lhx/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: FCUV correlations · LHX correlations
