CING vs QQQ: Correlation
How closely do Cingulate Inc. (CING) and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.14, which is weak.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CING and QQQ?
On 3 years of weekly data the CING/QQQ correlation comes out at 0.14, weak. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.09) runs below the 3-year figure (0.14). The 5-year figure is 0.11, and annualized covariance runs at 1090.1 %².
By 3-year correlation, QQQ places #9 of the 14 assets tracked against CING. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +30.1% for CING and +26.3% for QQQ. One caveat on sizing: CING is 20.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CING vs QQQ: side by side
| CING (Cingulate Inc.) | QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +30.1% | +26.3% |
| 5-year return | -99.5% | +95.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 405.7% | 19.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 3.94 | 1.28 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.0% | -22.8% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.18% |
| Assets under management | – | $452.8B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | ETF · US Growth & Tech |
QQQ is a Large Growth fund from Invesco: $452.8B under management, 104 holdings, a 0.18% expense ratio, a 0.44% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CING | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -63.8% | -32.6% |
| 2023 | -61.7% | +54.9% |
| 2024 | -94.6% | +25.6% |
| 2025 | -12.0% | +20.8% |
| 2026 | +25.3% | +17.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CING and QQQ good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at 0.14, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CING and QQQ?
The CING/QQQ correlation stands at 0.14 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.09, 5 years: 0.11), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is QQQ a good diversifier for CING?
Yes: at 0.14, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of 0.14 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.14 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cing-vs-qqq.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cing-vs-qqq/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CING correlations · QQQ correlations
