PairBook
HomeBEAT › BEAT vs CMBT

BEAT vs CMBT: Correlation

How closely do Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT) and CMB.TECH NV (CMBT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.21, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.30
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1196.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BEAT and CMBT?

Over the past 3 years, BEAT and CMBT moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.30) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.14, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1196.5 %².

Within BEAT's tracked universe of 16 assets, CMBT comes in at #11 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CMBT ahead by 202.8 points (-58.8% versus +144.0%). Risk is not evenly split, since BEAT carries 4.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BEAT vs CMBT: side by side

BEAT (Heartbeam, Inc.)CMBT (CMB.TECH NV)
1-year return-58.8%+144.0%
5-year return-89.6%+306.2%
Volatility (ann.)152.8%38.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.650.67
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.1%-57.2%
Market cap$5.3B
P/E (trailing)10.2
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CMBT -57.2% vs -86.1%Higher 5y return: CMBT +306.2% vs -89.6%
-64%0%+130%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BEAT · CMBT

Year-by-year returns

YearBEATCMBT
2022+58.4%+93.2%
2023-51.8%+26.3%
2024-2.1%-22.7%
2025+4.3%-2.8%
2026-79.8%+100.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BEAT and CMBT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, BEAT and CMBT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BEAT and CMBT?

The BEAT/CMBT correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.30, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CMBT a good diversifier for BEAT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, BEAT and CMBT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/beat-vs-cmbt.json

BEAT vs CMBT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21BEAT vs CMBT-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BEAT vs CMBT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/beat-vs-cmbt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/beat-vs-cmbt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BEAT correlations · CMBT correlations