PairBook
HomeBEAT › BEAT vs WELL

BEAT vs WELL: Correlation

Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT) and Welltower (WELL) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.26.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.26
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-847.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BEAT and WELL?

Over the past 3 years, BEAT and WELL moved with a correlation of -0.26, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.38) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.26). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.21, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -847.4 %².

Among the 16 assets we track against BEAT, WELL sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #14. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months WELL outperformed by 103.7 percentage points (-58.8% for BEAT against +44.9% for WELL). One caveat on sizing: BEAT is 7.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BEAT vs WELL: side by side

BEAT (Heartbeam, Inc.)WELL (Welltower)
1-year return-58.8%+44.9%
5-year return-89.6%+214.9%
Volatility (ann.)152.8%21.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.650.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.1%-13.0%
Market cap$172.6B
P/E (trailing)108.9
Dividend yield0.00%1.27%
Sector / categoryUS ListedReal Estate
Higher yield: WELL 1.27% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WELL -13.0% vs -86.1%Higher 5y return: WELL +214.9% vs -89.6%
-64%0%+130%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BEAT · WELL

Year-by-year returns

YearBEATWELL
2022+58.4%-21.2%
2023-51.8%+41.8%
2024-2.1%+43.1%
2025+4.3%+49.9%
2026-79.8%+30.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BEAT and WELL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, BEAT and WELL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BEAT and WELL?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.26 over 3 years, with -0.38 over the last year and -0.21 over 5 years.

Is WELL a good diversifier for BEAT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.26, BEAT and WELL have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.26 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.26 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/beat-vs-well.json

BEAT vs WELL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.26BEAT vs WELL-0.26

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BEAT vs WELL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/beat-vs-well.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/beat-vs-well/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BEAT correlations · WELL correlations