PairBook
HomeBEAT › BEAT vs RZLT

BEAT vs RZLT: Correlation

How closely do Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT) and Rezolute, Inc. (RZLT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.33, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.33
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.67
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-5300.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BEAT and RZLT?

Over the past 3 years, BEAT and RZLT moved with a correlation of -0.33, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.67) than the 3-year average (-0.33). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.21, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -5300.3 %².

RZLT is close to the least connected end of BEAT's tracked universe, ranking #15 of 16. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RZLT outperformed by 28.0 percentage points (-58.8% for BEAT against -30.8% for RZLT).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BEAT vs RZLT: side by side

BEAT (Heartbeam, Inc.)RZLT (Rezolute, Inc.)
1-year return-58.8%-30.8%
5-year return-89.6%-47.6%
Volatility (ann.)152.8%103.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.650.65
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.1%-87.2%
Market cap$0.5B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BEAT -86.1% vs -87.2%Higher 5y return: RZLT -47.6% vs -89.6%
-78%0%+130%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BEAT · RZLT

Year-by-year returns

YearBEATRZLT
2022+58.4%-56.7%
2023-51.8%-52.0%
2024-2.1%+393.5%
2025+4.3%-51.8%
2026-79.8%+111.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BEAT and RZLT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, BEAT and RZLT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BEAT and RZLT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BEAT and RZLT is -0.33 over 3 years, -0.67 over 1 year and -0.21 over 5 years.

Is RZLT a good diversifier for BEAT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, BEAT and RZLT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?

A reading of -0.33 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/beat-vs-rzlt.json

BEAT vs RZLT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.33BEAT vs RZLT-0.33

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BEAT vs RZLT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/beat-vs-rzlt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/beat-vs-rzlt/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BEAT correlations · RZLT correlations