PairBook
HomeBEAT › BEAT vs LAKE

BEAT vs LAKE: Correlation

How closely do Heartbeam, Inc. (BEAT) and Lakeland Industries, Inc. (LAKE) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.34, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.34
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.58
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.24
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2884.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BEAT and LAKE?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BEAT and LAKE correlate at -0.34, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.58) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.34). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.24, with an annualized covariance of -2884.4 %².

Among the 16 assets we track against BEAT, LAKE sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #16. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with LAKE ahead by 36.3 points (-58.8% versus -22.5%). Risk is not evenly split, since BEAT carries 2.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BEAT vs LAKE: side by side

BEAT (Heartbeam, Inc.)LAKE (Lakeland Industries, Inc.)
1-year return-58.8%-22.5%
5-year return-89.6%-49.3%
Volatility (ann.)152.8%55.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.651.32
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.1%-71.2%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.76%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: LAKE 0.76% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: LAKE -71.2% vs -86.1%Higher 5y return: LAKE -49.3% vs -89.6%
-64%0%+130%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BEAT · LAKE

Year-by-year returns

YearBEATLAKE
2022+58.4%-38.7%
2023-51.8%+40.6%
2024-2.1%+38.7%
2025+4.3%-65.2%
2026-79.8%+35.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BEAT and LAKE good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.34 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BEAT and LAKE?

The BEAT/LAKE correlation stands at -0.34 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.58, 5 years: -0.24), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is LAKE a good diversifier for BEAT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.34 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?

A reading of -0.34 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/beat-vs-lake.json

BEAT vs LAKE: 3-year weekly correlation -0.34BEAT vs LAKE-0.34

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BEAT vs LAKE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/beat-vs-lake.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/beat-vs-lake/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BEAT correlations · LAKE correlations