PairBook
HomeALMS › ALMS vs TTWO

ALMS vs TTWO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) carry a correlation of -0.17, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-652.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ALMS and TTWO?

Over the past 3 years, ALMS and TTWO moved with a correlation of -0.17, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at -0.03 versus -0.17 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -652.3 %².

Within ALMS's tracked universe of 92 assets, TTWO comes in at #29 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: ALMS led by 371.3 percentage points, +371.7% for ALMS against +0.4% for TTWO. One caveat on sizing: ALMS is 4.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ALMS vs TTWO: side by side

ALMS (Alumis Inc.)TTWO (Take-Two Interactive)
1-year return+371.7%+0.4%
5-year returnn/a+47.3%
Volatility (ann.)130.0%27.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.500.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-78.9%-27.7%
Market cap$3.0B$43.6B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedCommunication Services
Smaller drawdown: TTWO -27.7% vs -78.9%
-21%0%+558%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ALMS · TTWO

Year-by-year returns

YearALMSTTWO
2022-41.4%
2023+54.6%
2024+14.4%
2025+24.2%+39.1%
2026+137.8%-9.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ALMS and TTWO good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ALMS and TTWO?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ALMS and TTWO is -0.17 over 3 years, -0.03 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is TTWO a good diversifier for ALMS?

Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-ttwo.json

ALMS vs TTWO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17ALMS vs TTWO-0.17

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ALMS vs TTWO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/alms-vs-ttwo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-ttwo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ALMS correlations · TTWO correlations