ALMS vs BVC: Correlation
Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and BitVentures Limited (BVC) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.53.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ALMS and BVC?
Over the past 3 years, ALMS and BVC moved with a correlation of 0.53, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.78) than the 3-year average (0.53). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 38030.4 %².
BVC is one of the assets that tracks ALMS most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 92 assets we track against ALMS. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BVC ahead by 1450.3 points (+371.7% versus +1822.0%). Risk is not evenly split, since BVC carries 3.7 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ALMS vs BVC: side by side
| ALMS (Alumis Inc.) | BVC (BitVentures Limited) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +371.7% | +1822.0% |
| 5-year return | n/a | +74.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 130.0% | 476.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -1.50 | 1.30 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -78.9% | -97.2% |
| Market cap | $3.0B | $2.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 8.3 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ALMS | BVC |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | +1.2% |
| 2023 | – | -67.4% |
| 2024 | – | -33.5% |
| 2025 | +24.2% | -7.3% |
| 2026 | +137.8% | +1002.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ALMS and BVC good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.53 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ALMS and BVC?
The ALMS/BVC correlation stands at 0.53 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.78, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is BVC a good diversifier for ALMS?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.53 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.53 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.53 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-bvc.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-bvc/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ALMS correlations · BVC correlations
