ALMS vs GNLX: Correlation
How closely do Alumis Inc. (ALMS) and Genelux Corporation (GNLX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.39, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ALMS and GNLX?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ALMS and GNLX correlate at -0.39, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.49 over 1 year against -0.39 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -4791.7 %².
Among the 92 assets we track against ALMS, GNLX sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #92. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ALMS ahead by 392.6 points (+371.7% versus -20.9%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ALMS vs GNLX: side by side
| ALMS (Alumis Inc.) | GNLX (Genelux Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +371.7% | -20.9% |
| 5-year return | n/a | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 130.0% | 94.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -1.50 | 0.99 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -78.9% | -94.4% |
| Market cap | $3.0B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ALMS | GNLX |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | – | -83.2% |
| 2025 | +24.2% | +84.7% |
| 2026 | +137.8% | -33.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ALMS and GNLX good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.39 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ALMS and GNLX?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.39 over 3 years, with -0.49 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.
Is GNLX a good diversifier for ALMS?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.39 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.39 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.39 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/alms-vs-gnlx.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/alms-vs-gnlx/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ALMS correlations · GNLX correlations
