PairBook
HomeSNOW › SNOW vs STZ

SNOW vs STZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Constellation Brands (STZ) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-305.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SNOW and STZ?

Over the past 3 years, SNOW and STZ moved with a correlation of -0.21, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.38 versus -0.21 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.02, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -305.3 %².

Out of 17 assets tracked against SNOW, STZ lands near the bottom at #14. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SNOW ahead by 79.9 points (+64.2% versus -15.7%). Note the risk asymmetry: SNOW runs 2.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SNOW vs STZ: side by side

SNOW (Snowflake Inc.)STZ (Constellation Brands)
1-year return+64.2%-15.7%
5-year return+10.5%-31.9%
Volatility (ann.)55.4%26.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.410.41
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.3%-51.3%
Market cap$114.1B$22.4B
P/E (trailing)12.8
Dividend yield0.00%3.04%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Higher yield: STZ 3.04% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: STZ -51.3% vs -56.3%Higher 5y return: SNOW +10.5% vs -31.9%
-46%0%+48%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. SNOW · STZ

Year-by-year returns

YearSNOWSTZ
2022-57.6%-6.4%
2023+38.6%+5.8%
2024-22.4%-7.1%
2025+42.1%-36.0%
2026+50.0%-2.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SNOW and STZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SNOW and STZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.38 over the last year and 0.02 over 5 years.

Is STZ a good diversifier for SNOW?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/snow-vs-stz.json

SNOW vs STZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21SNOW vs STZ-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![SNOW vs STZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/snow-vs-stz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/snow-vs-stz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SNOW correlations · STZ correlations