PairBook
HomeSNOW › SNOW vs VRRM

SNOW vs VRRM: Correlation

Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) and Verra Mobility Corporation (VRRM) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-800.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SNOW and VRRM?

Over the past 3 years, SNOW and VRRM moved with a correlation of -0.28, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.50 versus -0.28 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.07, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -800.4 %².

Out of 17 assets tracked against SNOW, VRRM lands near the bottom at #15. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SNOW ahead by 146.8 points (+64.2% versus -82.6%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SNOW vs VRRM: side by side

SNOW (Snowflake Inc.)VRRM (Verra Mobility Corporation)
1-year return+64.2%-82.6%
5-year return+10.5%-71.6%
Volatility (ann.)55.4%50.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.410.33
Max drawdown (3Y)-56.3%-87.5%
Market cap$114.1B$0.7B
P/E (trailing)16.3
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: SNOW -56.3% vs -87.5%Higher 5y return: SNOW +10.5% vs -71.6%
-84%0%+48%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). SNOW · VRRM

Year-by-year returns

YearSNOWVRRM
2022-57.6%-10.4%
2023+38.6%+66.5%
2024-22.4%+5.0%
2025+42.1%-7.3%
2026+50.0%-80.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SNOW and VRRM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SNOW and VRRM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.28 over 3 years, with -0.50 over the last year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is VRRM a good diversifier for SNOW?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.28 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

A reading of -0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/snow-vs-vrrm.json

SNOW vs VRRM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28SNOW vs VRRM-0.28

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![SNOW vs VRRM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/snow-vs-vrrm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/snow-vs-vrrm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SNOW correlations · VRRM correlations