PairBook
HomeSMTK › SMTK vs XOM

SMTK vs XOM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK) and ExxonMobil (XOM) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-872.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SMTK and XOM?

Over the past 3 years, SMTK and XOM moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.38 versus -0.22 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -872.1 %².

XOM is close to the least connected end of SMTK's tracked universe, ranking #13 of 15. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months XOM outperformed by 131.9 percentage points (-89.1% for SMTK against +42.8% for XOM). One caveat on sizing: SMTK is 6.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SMTK vs XOM: side by side

SMTK (SmartKem, Inc.)XOM (ExxonMobil)
1-year return-89.1%+42.8%
5-year returnn/a+237.9%
Volatility (ann.)155.8%24.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.160.01
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.2%-20.1%
Market cap$643.3B
P/E (trailing)20.1
Dividend yield0.00%2.58%
Sector / categoryUS ListedEnergy
Higher yield: XOM 2.58% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: XOM -20.1% vs -99.2%
-96%0%+59%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). SMTK · XOM

Year-by-year returns

YearSMTKXOM
2022+87.4%
2023-6.3%
2024+11.3%
2025-63.3%+16.0%
2026-93.4%+32.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are SMTK and XOM good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SMTK and XOM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between SMTK and XOM is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.38 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is XOM a good diversifier for SMTK?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/smtk-vs-xom.json

SMTK vs XOM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22SMTK vs XOM-0.22

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![SMTK vs XOM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/smtk-vs-xom.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/smtk-vs-xom/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SMTK correlations · XOM correlations