PairBook
HomeMF › MF vs SMTK

MF vs SMTK: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MindForge Inc. - Class A (MF) and SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK) carry a correlation of 0.39, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
-0.12
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
52279.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MF and SMTK?

Over the past 3 years, MF and SMTK moved with a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.12) runs below the 3-year figure (0.39). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 52279.5 %².

By 3-year correlation, SMTK places #17 of the 23 assets tracked against MF. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MF ahead by 17.5 points (-71.6% versus -89.1%). Note the risk asymmetry: MF runs 5.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MF vs SMTK: side by side

MF (MindForge Inc. - Class A)SMTK (SmartKem, Inc.)
1-year return-71.6%-89.1%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)830.3%155.8%
Beta vs S&P 5003.38-0.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.7%-99.2%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: SMTK -99.2% vs -99.7%
-96%0%+38%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MF · SMTK

Are MF and SMTK good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.39, MF and SMTK keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MF and SMTK?

The MF/SMTK correlation stands at 0.39 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.12, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SMTK a good diversifier for MF?

Reasonably. At 0.39, MF and SMTK keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mf-vs-smtk.json

MF vs SMTK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39MF vs SMTK0.39

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MF vs SMTK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mf-vs-smtk.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mf-vs-smtk/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MF correlations · SMTK correlations