MF vs TBBB: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MindForge Inc. - Class A (MF) and BBB Foods Inc. Class A (TBBB) carry a correlation of -0.24, a negative link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MF and TBBB?
Over the past 3 years, MF and TBBB moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.22) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.24). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -8607.9 %².
Out of 23 assets tracked against MF, TBBB lands near the bottom at #22. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TBBB ahead by 157.5 points (-71.6% versus +85.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: MF runs 19.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MF vs TBBB: side by side
| MF (MindForge Inc. - Class A) | TBBB (BBB Foods Inc. Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -71.6% | +85.9% |
| 5-year return | n/a | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 830.3% | 41.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 3.38 | 0.96 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.7% | -29.6% |
| Market cap | – | $5.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Are MF and TBBB good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, MF and TBBB have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MF and TBBB?
The MF/TBBB correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.22, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is TBBB a good diversifier for MF?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, MF and TBBB have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mf-vs-tbbb.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mf-vs-tbbb/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MF correlations · TBBB correlations
