PairBook
HomeMF › MF vs UMAC

MF vs UMAC: Correlation

How closely do MindForge Inc. - Class A (MF) and Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.80, which is very strong.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.80
very strong
Correlation (1Y)
-0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
167051.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MF and UMAC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MF and UMAC correlate at 0.80, very strong, meaning they move nearly in lockstep. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.03) than the 3-year average (0.80). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of 167051.9 %².

UMAC is one of the assets that tracks MF most closely: it ranks #3 out of the 23 assets we track against MF. The last year tells two different stories: UMAC led by 228.7 percentage points, -71.6% for MF against +157.1% for UMAC. One caveat on sizing: MF is 3.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MF vs UMAC: side by side

MF (MindForge Inc. - Class A)UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc.)
1-year return-71.6%+157.1%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)830.3%248.9%
Beta vs S&P 5003.383.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.7%-75.6%
Market cap$1.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: UMAC -75.6% vs -99.7%
-96%0%+256%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MF · UMAC

Are MF and UMAC good diversifiers for each other?

No. With a correlation of 0.80, MF and UMAC move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MF and UMAC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MF and UMAC is 0.80 over 3 years, -0.03 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is UMAC a good diversifier for MF?

No. With a correlation of 0.80, MF and UMAC move nearly in lockstep, so holding both adds very little diversification.

What does a correlation of 0.80 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.80 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mf-vs-umac.json

MF vs UMAC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.80MF vs UMAC0.80

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MF vs UMAC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mf-vs-umac.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mf-vs-umac/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MF correlations · UMAC correlations