PairBook
HomeSMTK › SMTK vs UMAC

SMTK vs UMAC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK) and Unusual Machines, Inc. (UMAC) carry a correlation of 0.43, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.43
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
17384.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are SMTK and UMAC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of SMTK and UMAC correlate at 0.43, moderate. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.13) runs below the 3-year figure (0.43). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of 17384.1 %².

Few assets follow SMTK as closely as UMAC, which ranks #2 of 15 tracked partners. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months UMAC outperformed by 246.2 percentage points (-89.1% for SMTK against +157.1% for UMAC). Risk is not evenly split, since UMAC carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

SMTK vs UMAC: side by side

SMTK (SmartKem, Inc.)UMAC (Unusual Machines, Inc.)
1-year return-89.1%+157.1%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)155.8%248.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.163.43
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.2%-75.6%
Market cap$1.3B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: UMAC -75.6% vs -99.2%
-96%0%+256%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. SMTK · UMAC

Are SMTK and UMAC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between SMTK and UMAC?

The SMTK/UMAC correlation stands at 0.43 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.13, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is UMAC a good diversifier for SMTK?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.43 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.43 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.43 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/smtk-vs-umac.json

SMTK vs UMAC: 3-year weekly correlation 0.43SMTK vs UMAC0.43

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![SMTK vs UMAC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/smtk-vs-umac.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/smtk-vs-umac/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: SMTK correlations · UMAC correlations