PairBook
HomeQTWO › QTWO vs TASK

QTWO vs TASK: Correlation

Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) and TaskUs, Inc. (TASK) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.49.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.49
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.50
long-run
Ann. covariance
1184.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are QTWO and TASK?

On 3 years of weekly data the QTWO/TASK correlation comes out at 0.49, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.51 over 1 year against 0.49 over 3. The 5-year figure is 0.50, and annualized covariance runs at 1184.6 %².

Within QTWO's tracked universe of 39 assets, TASK comes in at #26 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance QTWO holds a 11.6-point edge, -16.0% against -27.6%.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

QTWO vs TASK: side by side

QTWO (Q2 Holdings, Inc.)TASK (TaskUs, Inc.)
1-year return-16.0%-27.6%
5-year return-24.7%-78.6%
Volatility (ann.)41.9%58.0%
Beta vs S&P 5001.411.30
Max drawdown (3Y)-62.0%-63.0%
Market cap$4.1B$0.8B
P/E (trailing)45.96.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: TASK 6.7 vs 45.9Smaller drawdown: QTWO -62.0% vs -63.0%Higher 5y return: QTWO -24.7% vs -78.6%
-60%0%+4%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. QTWO · TASK

Year-by-year returns

YearQTWOTASK
2022-66.2%-68.7%
2023+61.6%-22.7%
2024+131.9%+29.6%
2025-28.3%-30.4%
2026-9.0%+6.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are QTWO and TASK good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.49 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between QTWO and TASK?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.49 over 3 years, with 0.51 over the last year and 0.50 over 5 years.

Is TASK a good diversifier for QTWO?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.49 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?

A reading of 0.49 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/qtwo-vs-task.json

QTWO vs TASK: 3-year weekly correlation 0.49QTWO vs TASK0.49

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![QTWO vs TASK correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/qtwo-vs-task.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/qtwo-vs-task/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: QTWO correlations · TASK correlations