PairBook
HomeFNGD › FNGD vs QTWO

FNGD vs QTWO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) and Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) carry a correlation of -0.41, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.41
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.48
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1291.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGD and QTWO?

On 3 years of weekly data the FNGD/QTWO correlation comes out at -0.41, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (-0.22) than the 3-year average (-0.41). The 5-year figure is -0.48, and annualized covariance runs at -1291.2 %².

Among the 1743 assets we track against FNGD, QTWO ranks #1393 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: QTWO led by 39.7 percentage points, -55.7% for FNGD against -16.0% for QTWO. Risk is not evenly split, since FNGD carries 1.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGD vs QTWO: side by side

FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due)QTWO (Q2 Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-55.7%-16.0%
5-year return-99.4%-24.7%
Volatility (ann.)75.7%41.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-4.541.41
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.6%-62.0%
Market cap$4.1B
P/E (trailing)20.645.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: FNGD 20.6 vs 45.9Smaller drawdown: QTWO -62.0% vs -97.6%Higher 5y return: QTWO -24.7% vs -99.4%
-52%0%+49%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. FNGD · QTWO

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGDQTWO
2022+52.2%-66.2%
2023-90.1%+61.6%
2024-76.6%+131.9%
2025-61.4%-28.3%
2026-49.5%-9.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGD and QTWO good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.41 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGD and QTWO?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between FNGD and QTWO is -0.41 over 3 years, -0.22 over 1 year and -0.48 over 5 years.

Is QTWO a good diversifier for FNGD?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.41 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.41 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngd-vs-qtwo.json

FNGD vs QTWO: 3-year weekly correlation -0.41FNGD vs QTWO-0.41

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![FNGD vs QTWO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngd-vs-qtwo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngd-vs-qtwo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGD correlations · QTWO correlations