PairBook
HomeBL › BL vs QTWO

BL vs QTWO: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BlackLine, Inc. (BL) and Q2 Holdings, Inc. (QTWO) carry a correlation of 0.60, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.60
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.59
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.59
long-run
Ann. covariance
1029.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BL and QTWO?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BL and QTWO correlate at 0.60, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.59 over 1 year against 0.60 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.59, with an annualized covariance of 1029.7 %².

QTWO is one of the assets that tracks BL most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 15 assets we track against BL. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with QTWO ahead by 22.3 points (-38.3% versus -16.0%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BL vs QTWO: side by side

BL (BlackLine, Inc.)QTWO (Q2 Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-38.3%-16.0%
5-year return-69.6%-24.7%
Volatility (ann.)40.7%41.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.831.41
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.2%-62.0%
Market cap$2.0B$4.1B
P/E (trailing)60.245.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: QTWO 45.9 vs 60.2Smaller drawdown: QTWO -62.0% vs -63.2%Higher 5y return: QTWO -24.7% vs -69.6%
-50%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BL · QTWO

Year-by-year returns

YearBLQTWO
2022-35.0%-66.2%
2023-7.2%+61.6%
2024-2.7%+131.9%
2025-9.0%-28.3%
2026-39.0%-9.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BL and QTWO good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.60 means BL and QTWO share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BL and QTWO?

The BL/QTWO correlation stands at 0.60 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.59, 5 years: 0.59), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QTWO a good diversifier for BL?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.60 means BL and QTWO share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.60 mean?

A reading of 0.60 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bl-vs-qtwo.json

BL vs QTWO: 3-year weekly correlation 0.60BL vs QTWO0.60

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BL vs QTWO correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bl-vs-qtwo.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bl-vs-qtwo/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BL correlations · QTWO correlations