PairBook
HomeBL › BL vs VXZ

BL vs VXZ: Correlation

BlackLine, Inc. (BL) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.30.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.33
long-run
Ann. covariance
-315.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BL and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BL and VXZ correlate at -0.30, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.18) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.30). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.33, with an annualized covariance of -315.6 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against BL, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #15. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with VXZ ahead by 22.2 points (-38.3% versus -16.1%). Risk is not evenly split, since BL carries 1.6 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BL vs VXZ: side by side

BL (BlackLine, Inc.)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return-38.3%-16.1%
5-year return-69.6%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)40.7%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.83-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-63.2%-36.4%
Market cap$2.0B
P/E (trailing)60.2
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -63.2%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -69.6%
-50%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BL · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearBLVXZ
2022-35.0%+0.5%
2023-7.2%-44.0%
2024-2.7%-12.7%
2025-9.0%+5.7%
2026-39.0%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BL and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, BL and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BL and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.30 over 3 years, with -0.18 over the last year and -0.33 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for BL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.30, BL and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bl-vs-vxz.json

BL vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30BL vs VXZ-0.30

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BL vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bl-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bl-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BL correlations · VXZ correlations