PUMP vs SVV: Correlation
ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and Savers Value Village, Inc. (SVV) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are PUMP and SVV?
On 3 years of weekly data the PUMP/SVV correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.46) than the 3-year average (-0.24). The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -868.7 %².
Among the 28 assets we track against PUMP, SVV ranks #20 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PUMP ahead by 137.6 points (+128.2% versus -9.4%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
PUMP vs SVV: side by side
| PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) | SVV (Savers Value Village, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +128.2% | -9.4% |
| 5-year return | +45.4% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 65.1% | 55.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.73 | 0.87 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -59.1% | -73.6% |
| Market cap | $1.4B | $1.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 70.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | PUMP | SVV |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +28.0% | – |
| 2023 | -19.2% | – |
| 2024 | +11.3% | -41.0% |
| 2025 | +1.9% | -8.9% |
| 2026 | +17.6% | +12.7% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are PUMP and SVV good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, PUMP and SVV have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between PUMP and SVV?
The PUMP/SVV correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.46, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is SVV a good diversifier for PUMP?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.24, PUMP and SVV have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pump-vs-svv.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pump-vs-svv/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: PUMP correlations · SVV correlations
