PairBook
HomePUMP › PUMP vs QTI

PUMP vs QTI: Correlation

ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) and QT Imaging Holdings, Inc. (QTI) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.28.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.28
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.57
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.23
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1992.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PUMP and QTI?

On 3 years of weekly data the PUMP/QTI correlation comes out at -0.28, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.57 versus -0.28 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.23, and annualized covariance runs at -1992.7 %².

Out of 28 assets tracked against PUMP, QTI lands near the bottom at #26. The last year tells two different stories: PUMP led by 219.8 percentage points, +128.2% for PUMP against -91.6% for QTI. Note the risk asymmetry: QTI runs 1.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PUMP vs QTI: side by side

PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.)QTI (QT Imaging Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return+128.2%-91.6%
5-year return+45.4%-97.9%
Volatility (ann.)65.1%108.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.730.12
Max drawdown (3Y)-59.1%-98.6%
Market cap$1.4B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: PUMP -59.1% vs -98.6%Higher 5y return: PUMP +45.4% vs -97.9%
-93%0%+266%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PUMP · QTI

Year-by-year returns

YearPUMPQTI
2022+28.0%+3.1%
2023-19.2%+7.7%
2024+11.3%-95.6%
2025+1.9%-16.7%
2026+17.6%-48.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PUMP and QTI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, PUMP and QTI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PUMP and QTI?

The PUMP/QTI correlation stands at -0.28 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.57, 5 years: -0.23), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is QTI a good diversifier for PUMP?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.28, PUMP and QTI have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.28 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.28 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pump-vs-qti.json

PUMP vs QTI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.28PUMP vs QTI-0.28

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PUMP vs QTI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pump-vs-qti.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pump-vs-qti/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PUMP correlations · QTI correlations