LRN vs PUMP: Correlation
Stride, Inc. (LRN) and ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.33.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are LRN and PUMP?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of LRN and PUMP correlate at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.60) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.33). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.19, with an annualized covariance of -1171.1 %².
Out of 16 assets tracked against LRN, PUMP lands near the bottom at #15. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with PUMP ahead by 178.0 points (-49.8% versus +128.2%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
LRN vs PUMP: side by side
| LRN (Stride, Inc.) | PUMP (ProPetro Holding Corp.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -49.8% | +128.2% |
| 5-year return | +147.2% | +45.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 54.4% | 65.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.26 | 0.73 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -64.1% | -59.1% |
| Market cap | $3.5B | $1.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 11.8 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | LRN | PUMP |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -6.2% | +28.0% |
| 2023 | +89.8% | -19.2% |
| 2024 | +75.1% | +11.3% |
| 2025 | -37.5% | +1.9% |
| 2026 | +31.4% | +17.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are LRN and PUMP good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, LRN and PUMP have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between LRN and PUMP?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between LRN and PUMP is -0.33 over 3 years, -0.60 over 1 year and -0.19 over 5 years.
Is PUMP a good diversifier for LRN?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.33, LRN and PUMP have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?
A reading of -0.33 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/lrn-vs-pump.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/lrn-vs-pump/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: LRN correlations · PUMP correlations
