PairBook
HomePULM › PULM vs SAIC

PULM vs SAIC: Correlation

Pulmatrix, Inc. (PULM) and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.34.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.34
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1636.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are PULM and SAIC?

On 3 years of weekly data the PULM/SAIC correlation comes out at -0.34, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.04) than the 3-year average (-0.34). The 5-year figure is -0.27, and annualized covariance runs at -1636.4 %².

Out of 37 assets tracked against PULM, SAIC lands near the bottom at #33. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with SAIC ahead by 78.3 points (-68.7% versus +9.6%). Note the risk asymmetry: PULM runs 4.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

PULM vs SAIC: side by side

PULM (Pulmatrix, Inc.)SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation)
1-year return-68.7%+9.6%
5-year return-90.6%+64.0%
Volatility (ann.)144.8%33.6%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.180.36
Max drawdown (3Y)-88.1%-45.7%
Market cap$5.5B
P/E (trailing)14.5
Dividend yield0.00%1.16%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: SAIC 1.16% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: SAIC -45.7% vs -88.1%Higher 5y return: SAIC +64.0% vs -90.6%
-75%0%+25%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. PULM · SAIC

Year-by-year returns

YearPULMSAIC
2022-55.7%+34.9%
2023-52.1%+13.6%
2024+275.3%-9.0%
2025-68.1%-8.7%
2026-31.8%+29.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are PULM and SAIC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between PULM and SAIC?

The PULM/SAIC correlation stands at -0.34 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.04, 5 years: -0.27), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is SAIC a good diversifier for PULM?

Yes: at -0.34, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.34 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.34 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pulm-vs-saic.json

PULM vs SAIC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.34PULM vs SAIC-0.34

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![PULM vs SAIC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/pulm-vs-saic.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pulm-vs-saic/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: PULM correlations · SAIC correlations