PULM vs SNT: Correlation
Pulmatrix, Inc. (PULM) and Senstar Technologies Corporation (SNT) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.57.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are PULM and SNT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of PULM and SNT correlate at 0.57, moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.13) than the 3-year average (0.57). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.52, with an annualized covariance of 5420.3 %².
By 3-year correlation, SNT places #5 of the 37 assets tracked against PULM. Over the last 12 months SNT came out ahead by 6.7 percentage points (-68.7% against -62.0%). Note the risk asymmetry: PULM runs 2.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
PULM vs SNT: side by side
| PULM (Pulmatrix, Inc.) | SNT (Senstar Technologies Corporation) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -68.7% | -62.0% |
| 5-year return | -90.6% | -57.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 144.8% | 66.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.18 | 0.71 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.1% | -69.2% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 85.5 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | PULM | SNT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -55.7% | -57.7% |
| 2023 | -52.1% | +2.4% |
| 2024 | +275.3% | +166.7% |
| 2025 | -68.1% | +40.4% |
| 2026 | -31.8% | -64.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are PULM and SNT good diversifiers for each other?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.57 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
FAQ
What is the correlation between PULM and SNT?
The PULM/SNT correlation stands at 0.57 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.13, 5 years: 0.52), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is SNT a good diversifier for PULM?
Somewhat, no more. With 0.57 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.
What does a correlation of 0.57 mean?
A reading of 0.57 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/pulm-vs-snt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/pulm-vs-snt/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: PULM correlations · SNT correlations
