PairBook
HomeBTCS › BTCS vs PULM

BTCS vs PULM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BTCS Inc. (BTCS) and Pulmatrix, Inc. (PULM) carry a correlation of 0.67, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.67
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.02
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.60
long-run
Ann. covariance
15720.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BTCS and PULM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BTCS and PULM correlate at 0.67, strong. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.02) than the 3-year average (0.67). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.60, with an annualized covariance of 15720.6 %².

In BTCS's tracked universe of 20 assets, PULM sits right near the top at #3. Over the last 12 months BTCS came out ahead by 6.4 percentage points (-62.3% against -68.7%).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BTCS vs PULM: side by side

BTCS (BTCS Inc.)PULM (Pulmatrix, Inc.)
1-year return-62.3%-68.7%
5-year return-79.2%-90.6%
Volatility (ann.)161.4%144.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.34-0.18
Max drawdown (3Y)-84.9%-88.1%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BTCS -84.9% vs -88.1%Higher 5y return: BTCS -79.2% vs -90.6%
-76%0%+23%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BTCS · PULM

Year-by-year returns

YearBTCSPULM
2022-79.6%-55.7%
2023+158.7%-52.1%
2024+51.5%+275.3%
2025+8.1%-68.1%
2026-39.8%-31.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BTCS and PULM good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.67 means BTCS and PULM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BTCS and PULM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BTCS and PULM is 0.67 over 3 years, 0.02 over 1 year and 0.60 over 5 years.

Is PULM a good diversifier for BTCS?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.67 means BTCS and PULM share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.67 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btcs-vs-pulm.json

BTCS vs PULM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.67BTCS vs PULM0.67

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BTCS vs PULM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/btcs-vs-pulm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btcs-vs-pulm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BTCS correlations · PULM correlations