PairBook
HomeMSFT › MSFT vs VXZ

MSFT vs VXZ: Correlation

Microsoft (MSFT) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.38.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.38
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.38
long-run
Ann. covariance
-265.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MSFT and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MSFT and VXZ correlate at -0.38, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.36 over 1 year against -0.38 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.38, with an annualized covariance of -265.7 %².

Out of 39 assets tracked against MSFT, VXZ lands near the bottom at #37. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MSFT outperformed by 16.6 percentage points (+0.5% for MSFT against -16.1% for VXZ).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MSFT vs VXZ: side by side

MSFT (Microsoft)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+0.5%-16.1%
5-year return+73.3%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)27.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5001.12-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-34.5%-36.4%
Market cap$3,750.3B
P/E (trailing)28.1
Dividend yield0.73%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MSFT -34.5% vs -36.4%Higher 5y return: MSFT +73.3% vs -53.1%
-28%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. MSFT · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearMSFTVXZ
2022-28.0%+0.5%
2023+58.2%-44.0%
2024+12.9%-12.7%
2025+15.6%+5.7%
2026+5.1%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MSFT and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.38 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MSFT and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MSFT and VXZ is -0.38 over 3 years, -0.36 over 1 year and -0.38 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for MSFT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.38 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.38 mean?

A reading of -0.38 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/msft-vs-vxz.json

MSFT vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.38MSFT vs VXZ-0.38

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![MSFT vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/msft-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/msft-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MSFT correlations · VXZ correlations