PairBook
HomeFNGO › FNGO vs MSFT

FNGO vs MSFT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, MicroSectors FANG Index 2X Leveraged ETNs due January 8 (FNGO) and Microsoft (MSFT) carry a correlation of 0.69, a strong link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.69
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.62
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.74
long-run
Ann. covariance
979.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are FNGO and MSFT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of FNGO and MSFT correlate at 0.69, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.62 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.74, with an annualized covariance of 979.9 %².

Within FNGO's tracked universe of 35 assets, MSFT comes in at #10 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: FNGO led by 33.2 percentage points, +33.7% for FNGO against +0.5% for MSFT. Note the risk asymmetry: FNGO runs 1.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

FNGO vs MSFT: side by side

FNGO (MicroSectors FANG Index 2X Leveraged ETNs due January 8)MSFT (Microsoft)
1-year return+33.7%+0.5%
5-year return+220.3%+73.3%
Volatility (ann.)51.9%27.5%
Beta vs S&P 5003.121.12
Max drawdown (3Y)-47.6%-34.5%
Market cap$3,750.3B
P/E (trailing)30.828.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.73%
Sector / categoryUS ListedInformation Technology
Lower P/E: MSFT 28.1 vs 30.8Higher yield: MSFT 0.73% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MSFT -34.5% vs -47.6%Higher 5y return: FNGO +220.3% vs +73.3%
-30%0%+29%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. FNGO · MSFT

Year-by-year returns

YearFNGOMSFT
2022-71.6%-28.0%
2023+240.1%+58.2%
2024+101.7%+12.9%
2025+25.5%+15.6%
2026+30.1%+5.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are FNGO and MSFT good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means FNGO and MSFT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between FNGO and MSFT?

The FNGO/MSFT correlation stands at 0.69 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.62, 5 years: 0.74), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MSFT a good diversifier for FNGO?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means FNGO and MSFT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/fngo-vs-msft.json

FNGO vs MSFT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.69FNGO vs MSFT0.69

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![FNGO vs MSFT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/fngo-vs-msft.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/fngo-vs-msft/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: FNGO correlations · MSFT correlations