PairBook
HomeMRT › MRT vs PCRX

MRT vs PCRX: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Marti Technologies, Inc. Class A (MRT) and Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.01
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-854.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MRT and PCRX?

On 3 years of weekly data the MRT/PCRX correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.01) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.21). The 5-year figure is -0.15, and annualized covariance runs at -854.7 %².

PCRX is close to the least connected end of MRT's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 10. The trailing year gives PCRX the advantage: -8.4% versus -1.1%, a 7.3-point spread. Note the risk asymmetry: MRT runs 1.6 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MRT vs PCRX: side by side

MRT (Marti Technologies, Inc. Class A)PCRX (Pacira BioSciences, Inc.)
1-year return-8.4%-1.1%
5-year return-76.5%-56.2%
Volatility (ann.)81.0%50.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.380.71
Max drawdown (3Y)-65.3%-67.9%
Market cap$0.2B$1.0B
P/E (trailing)73.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: MRT -65.3% vs -67.9%Higher 5y return: PCRX -56.2% vs -76.5%
-45%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MRT · PCRX

Year-by-year returns

YearMRTPCRX
2022+3.1%-35.8%
2023-93.6%-12.6%
2024+421.5%-44.2%
2025-30.1%+37.4%
2026-3.8%-0.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MRT and PCRX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, MRT and PCRX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MRT and PCRX?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MRT and PCRX is -0.21 over 3 years, 0.01 over 1 year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is PCRX a good diversifier for MRT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, MRT and PCRX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mrt-vs-pcrx.json

MRT vs PCRX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21MRT vs PCRX-0.21

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MRT vs PCRX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mrt-vs-pcrx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mrt-vs-pcrx/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MRT correlations · PCRX correlations