PairBook
HomeGPAT › GPAT vs MRT

GPAT vs MRT: Correlation

How closely do GP-Act III Acquisition Corp. - Class A (GPAT) and Marti Technologies, Inc. Class A (MRT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-50.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GPAT and MRT?

Over the past 3 years, GPAT and MRT moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.49 versus -0.22 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -50.8 %².

Among the 22 assets we track against GPAT, MRT ranks #15 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance GPAT holds a 11.8-point edge, +3.4% against -8.4%. Note the risk asymmetry: MRT runs 25.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GPAT vs MRT: side by side

GPAT (GP-Act III Acquisition Corp. - Class A)MRT (Marti Technologies, Inc. Class A)
1-year return+3.4%-8.4%
5-year returnn/a-76.5%
Volatility (ann.)3.2%81.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.050.38
Max drawdown (3Y)-2.1%-65.3%
Market cap$0.2B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)44.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GPAT -2.1% vs -65.3%
-45%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). GPAT · MRT

Year-by-year returns

YearGPATMRT
2022+3.1%
2023-93.6%
2024+421.5%
2025+5.4%-30.1%
2026+2.2%-3.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GPAT and MRT good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GPAT and MRT?

The GPAT/MRT correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.49, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MRT a good diversifier for GPAT?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.22 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gpat-vs-mrt.json

GPAT vs MRT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22GPAT vs MRT-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GPAT vs MRT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gpat-vs-mrt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gpat-vs-mrt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GPAT correlations · MRT correlations