PairBook
HomeGPAT › GPAT vs HYFM

GPAT vs HYFM: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, GP-Act III Acquisition Corp. - Class A (GPAT) and Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM) carry a correlation of 0.48, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.48
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.59
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
255.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are GPAT and HYFM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GPAT and HYFM correlate at 0.48, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.59) than the 3-year average (0.48). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of 255.1 %².

HYFM is one of the assets that tracks GPAT most closely: it ranks #1 out of the 22 assets we track against GPAT. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GPAT ahead by 83.9 points (+3.4% versus -80.5%). One caveat on sizing: HYFM is 46.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

GPAT vs HYFM: side by side

GPAT (GP-Act III Acquisition Corp. - Class A)HYFM (Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc.)
1-year return+3.4%-80.5%
5-year returnn/a-99.8%
Volatility (ann.)3.2%148.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.052.71
Max drawdown (3Y)-2.1%-96.6%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)44.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: GPAT -2.1% vs -96.6%
-84%0%+5%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. GPAT · HYFM

Year-by-year returns

YearGPATHYFM
2022-94.5%
2023-40.8%
2024-36.8%
2025+5.4%-74.0%
2026+2.2%-41.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are GPAT and HYFM good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.48, GPAT and HYFM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between GPAT and HYFM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between GPAT and HYFM is 0.48 over 3 years, 0.59 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is HYFM a good diversifier for GPAT?

Reasonably. At 0.48, GPAT and HYFM keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.48 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gpat-vs-hyfm.json

GPAT vs HYFM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.48GPAT vs HYFM0.48

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![GPAT vs HYFM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/gpat-vs-hyfm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gpat-vs-hyfm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: GPAT correlations · HYFM correlations