GMM vs MRT: Correlation
How closely do Global Mofy AI Limited - Class A (GMM) and Marti Technologies, Inc. Class A (MRT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.45, which is moderate.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GMM and MRT?
Over the past 3 years, GMM and MRT moved with a correlation of 0.45, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.07) than the 3-year average (0.45). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 40212.1 %².
By 3-year correlation, MRT places #11 of the 21 assets tracked against GMM. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with MRT ahead by 89.1 points (-97.5% versus -8.4%). One caveat on sizing: GMM is 13.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GMM vs MRT: side by side
| GMM (Global Mofy AI Limited - Class A) | MRT (Marti Technologies, Inc. Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -97.5% | -8.4% |
| 5-year return | n/a | -76.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 1098.3% | 81.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.95 | 0.38 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.7% | -65.3% |
| Market cap | – | $0.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GMM | MRT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | +3.1% |
| 2023 | – | -93.6% |
| 2024 | -30.5% | +421.5% |
| 2025 | -69.6% | -30.1% |
| 2026 | -95.4% | -3.8% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GMM and MRT good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.45, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GMM and MRT?
The GMM/MRT correlation stands at 0.45 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.07, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is MRT a good diversifier for GMM?
A fair diversifier. At 0.45, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.45 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.45 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gmm-vs-mrt.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gmm-vs-mrt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GMM correlations · MRT correlations
