GMM vs TBBB: Correlation
Global Mofy AI Limited - Class A (GMM) and BBB Foods Inc. Class A (TBBB) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.27.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are GMM and TBBB?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of GMM and TBBB correlate at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.02) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.27). Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -12953.4 %².
Among the 21 assets we track against GMM, TBBB sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #20. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with TBBB ahead by 183.4 points (-97.5% versus +85.9%). One caveat on sizing: GMM is 26.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
GMM vs TBBB: side by side
| GMM (Global Mofy AI Limited - Class A) | TBBB (BBB Foods Inc. Class A) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -97.5% | +85.9% |
| 5-year return | n/a | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 1098.3% | 41.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.95 | 0.96 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -99.7% | -29.6% |
| Market cap | – | $5.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | GMM | TBBB |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -30.5% | – |
| 2025 | -69.6% | +18.1% |
| 2026 | -95.4% | +45.9% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are GMM and TBBB good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between GMM and TBBB?
The GMM/TBBB correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.02, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is TBBB a good diversifier for GMM?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.27 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.27 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/gmm-vs-tbbb.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/gmm-vs-tbbb/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: GMM correlations · TBBB correlations
