PairBook
HomeMNDR › MNDR vs PACS

MNDR vs PACS: Correlation

How closely do Mobile-health Network Solutions - Class A (MNDR) and PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.57, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.57
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.78
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
11170.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MNDR and PACS?

Over the past 3 years, MNDR and PACS moved with a correlation of 0.57, which is moderate. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.78) runs above the 3-year figure (0.57). Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 11170.6 %².

Few assets follow MNDR as closely as PACS, which ranks #1 of 40 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: PACS led by 367.9 percentage points, -94.9% for MNDR against +273.0% for PACS.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MNDR vs PACS: side by side

MNDR (Mobile-health Network Solutions - Class A)PACS (PACS Group, Inc.)
1-year return-94.9%+273.0%
5-year returnn/an/a
Volatility (ann.)161.8%120.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.610.06
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-82.0%
Market cap$7.0B
P/E (trailing)25.9
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: PACS -82.0% vs -100.0%
-93%0%+334%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MNDR · PACS

Are MNDR and PACS good diversifiers for each other?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.57 means MNDR and PACS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MNDR and PACS?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MNDR and PACS is 0.57 over 3 years, 0.78 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.

Is PACS a good diversifier for MNDR?

Only partially. A correlation of 0.57 means MNDR and PACS share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.

What does a correlation of 0.57 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mndr-vs-pacs.json

MNDR vs PACS: 3-year weekly correlation 0.57MNDR vs PACS0.57

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![MNDR vs PACS correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mndr-vs-pacs.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mndr-vs-pacs/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MNDR correlations · PACS correlations