PairBook
HomeBNED › BNED vs MNDR

BNED vs MNDR: Correlation

How closely do Barnes & Noble Education, Inc (BNED) and Mobile-health Network Solutions - Class A (MNDR) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.31, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.24
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-5579.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BNED and MNDR?

Over the past 3 years, BNED and MNDR moved with a correlation of -0.31, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.24) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -5579.3 %².

Among the 11 assets we track against BNED, MNDR sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #11. The last year tells two different stories: BNED led by 136.0 percentage points, +41.1% for BNED against -94.9% for MNDR.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BNED vs MNDR: side by side

BNED (Barnes & Noble Education, Inc)MNDR (Mobile-health Network Solutions - Class A)
1-year return+41.1%-94.9%
5-year return-98.4%n/a
Volatility (ann.)111.9%161.8%
Beta vs S&P 5001.64-0.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.3%-100.0%
Market cap$0.4B
P/E (trailing)25.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BNED -97.3% vs -100.0%
-93%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BNED · MNDR

Year-by-year returns

YearBNEDMNDR
2022-74.3%
2023-14.9%
2024-93.3%
2025-8.5%-93.0%
2026+33.9%-68.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BNED and MNDR good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BNED and MNDR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.31 over 3 years, with -0.24 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MNDR a good diversifier for BNED?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

A reading of -0.31 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bned-vs-mndr.json

BNED vs MNDR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31BNED vs MNDR-0.31

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BNED vs MNDR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bned-vs-mndr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bned-vs-mndr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BNED correlations · MNDR correlations