PairBook
HomeBNED › BNED vs RMT

BNED vs RMT: Correlation

How closely do Barnes & Noble Education, Inc (BNED) and Royce Micro-Cap Trust, Inc. (RMT) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.39, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.39
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.47
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.33
long-run
Ann. covariance
903.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BNED and RMT?

On 3 years of weekly data the BNED/RMT correlation comes out at 0.39, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.47 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.33, and annualized covariance runs at 903.4 %².

In BNED's tracked universe of 11 assets, RMT sits right near the top at #3. Over the last 12 months RMT came out ahead by 7.3 percentage points (+41.1% against +48.4%). Risk is not evenly split, since BNED carries 5.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BNED vs RMT: side by side

BNED (Barnes & Noble Education, Inc)RMT (Royce Micro-Cap Trust, Inc.)
1-year return+41.1%+48.4%
5-year return-98.4%+80.1%
Volatility (ann.)111.9%20.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.641.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.3%-26.4%
Market cap$0.4B$0.8B
P/E (trailing)25.58.5
Dividend yield0.00%5.57%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: RMT 8.5 vs 25.5Higher yield: RMT 5.57% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RMT -26.4% vs -97.3%Higher 5y return: RMT +80.1% vs -98.4%
-27%0%+61%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BNED · RMT

Year-by-year returns

YearBNEDRMT
2022-74.3%-16.8%
2023-14.9%+15.8%
2024-93.3%+14.0%
2025-8.5%+16.1%
2026+33.9%+39.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BNED and RMT good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.39, BNED and RMT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BNED and RMT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BNED and RMT is 0.39 over 3 years, 0.47 over 1 year and 0.33 over 5 years.

Is RMT a good diversifier for BNED?

Reasonably. At 0.39, BNED and RMT keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.39 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bned-vs-rmt.json

BNED vs RMT: 3-year weekly correlation 0.39BNED vs RMT0.39

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BNED vs RMT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bned-vs-rmt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bned-vs-rmt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BNED correlations · RMT correlations