PairBook
HomeJ › J vs MNDR

J vs MNDR: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Jacobs Solutions (J) and Mobile-health Network Solutions - Class A (MNDR) carry a correlation of -0.32, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.50
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1377.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are J and MNDR?

Over the past 3 years, J and MNDR moved with a correlation of -0.32, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.50 versus -0.32 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -1377.6 %².

Out of 34 assets tracked against J, MNDR lands near the bottom at #32. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months J outperformed by 97.5 percentage points (+2.6% for J against -94.9% for MNDR). Note the risk asymmetry: MNDR runs 6.3 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

J vs MNDR: side by side

J (Jacobs Solutions)MNDR (Mobile-health Network Solutions - Class A)
1-year return+2.6%-94.9%
5-year return+40.5%n/a
Volatility (ann.)25.7%161.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.77-0.61
Max drawdown (3Y)-34.4%-100.0%
Market cap$17.6B
P/E (trailing)49.9
Dividend yield0.90%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Higher yield: J 0.90% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: J -34.4% vs -100.0%
-93%0%+19%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). J · MNDR

Year-by-year returns

YearJMNDR
2022-13.1%
2023+9.0%
2024+24.2%
2025+1.1%-93.0%
2026+14.6%-68.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are J and MNDR good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between J and MNDR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.32 over 3 years, with -0.50 over the last year and n/a over 5 years.

Is MNDR a good diversifier for J?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.32 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

A reading of -0.32 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/j-vs-mndr.json

J vs MNDR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32J vs MNDR-0.32

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![J vs MNDR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/j-vs-mndr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/j-vs-mndr/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: J correlations · MNDR correlations