PairBook
HomeMIN › MIN vs SNTG

MIN vs SNTG: Correlation

How closely do Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund (MIN) and Sentage Holdings Inc. - Class A (SNTG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.20, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.20
negative
Correlation (1Y)
0.04
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-208.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MIN and SNTG?

On 3 years of weekly data the MIN/SNTG correlation comes out at -0.20, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.04 versus -0.20 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.04, and annualized covariance runs at -208.5 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against MIN, SNTG sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #9. The trailing year gives SNTG the advantage: -0.2% versus +7.9%, a 8.1-point spread. One caveat on sizing: SNTG is 15.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MIN vs SNTG: side by side

MIN (Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund)SNTG (Sentage Holdings Inc. - Class A)
1-year return-0.2%+7.9%
5-year return+4.5%-93.0%
Volatility (ann.)8.2%126.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.151.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-7.1%-76.2%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)24.5
Dividend yield9.43%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: MIN 9.43% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MIN -7.1% vs -76.2%Higher 5y return: MIN +4.5% vs -93.0%
-19%0%+79%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. MIN · SNTG

Year-by-year returns

YearMINSNTG
2022-15.7%-68.8%
2023+6.3%+160.4%
2024+8.6%-63.8%
2025+7.2%+4.4%
2026-0.2%-5.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MIN and SNTG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MIN and SNTG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.20 over 3 years, with 0.04 over the last year and -0.04 over 5 years.

Is SNTG a good diversifier for MIN?

Yes: at -0.20, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.20 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.20 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/min-vs-sntg.json

MIN vs SNTG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.20MIN vs SNTG-0.20

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MIN vs SNTG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/min-vs-sntg.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/min-vs-sntg/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MIN correlations · SNTG correlations