MIN vs PPT: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund (MIN) and Franklin Premier Income Trust Shares of Beneficial Interest (PPT) carry a correlation of 0.57, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are MIN and PPT?
Over the past 3 years, MIN and PPT moved with a correlation of 0.57, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.55) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.51, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 40.3 %².
Few assets follow MIN as closely as PPT, which ranks #1 of 10 tracked partners. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -0.2% against +2.4%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
MIN vs PPT: side by side
| MIN (Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund) | PPT (Franklin Premier Income Trust Shares of Beneficial Interest) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -0.2% | +2.4% |
| 5-year return | +4.5% | +15.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 8.2% | 8.6% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.15 | 0.24 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -7.1% | -5.9% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 24.5 | 11.1 |
| Dividend yield | 9.43% | 9.07% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | MIN | PPT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -15.7% | -7.7% |
| 2023 | +6.3% | +7.4% |
| 2024 | +8.6% | +8.8% |
| 2025 | +7.2% | +8.4% |
| 2026 | -0.2% | +3.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are MIN and PPT good diversifiers for each other?
To a limited degree. At 0.57 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
FAQ
What is the correlation between MIN and PPT?
The MIN/PPT correlation stands at 0.57 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.55, 5 years: 0.51), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is PPT a good diversifier for MIN?
To a limited degree. At 0.57 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.
What does a correlation of 0.57 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.57 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/min-vs-ppt.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/min-vs-ppt/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: MIN correlations · PPT correlations
