BTZ vs MIN: Correlation
BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust (BTZ) and Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund (MIN) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.54.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BTZ and MIN?
Over the past 3 years, BTZ and MIN moved with a correlation of 0.54, which is moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.54) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.52, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 51.2 %².
Among the 25 assets we track against BTZ, MIN ranks #20 by 3-year correlation. Neither side won the trailing year by much: +1.6% against -0.2%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BTZ vs MIN: side by side
| BTZ (BlackRock Credit Allocation Income Trust) | MIN (Aberdeen Intermediate Income Fund) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +1.6% | -0.2% |
| 5-year return | +5.4% | +4.5% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 11.5% | 8.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.44 | 0.15 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -9.3% | -7.1% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 9.2 | 24.5 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 9.43% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BTZ | MIN |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -27.1% | -15.7% |
| 2023 | +12.8% | +6.3% |
| 2024 | +11.3% | +8.6% |
| 2025 | +13.7% | +7.2% |
| 2026 | +0.1% | -0.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BTZ and MIN good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.54 means BTZ and MIN share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BTZ and MIN?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BTZ and MIN is 0.54 over 3 years, 0.54 over 1 year and 0.52 over 5 years.
Is MIN a good diversifier for BTZ?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.54 means BTZ and MIN share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.54 mean?
A reading of 0.54 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/btz-vs-min.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/btz-vs-min/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BTZ correlations · MIN correlations
