PairBook
HomeMI › MI vs WFCF

MI vs WFCF: Correlation

How closely do NFT Limited Class A (MI) and Where Food Comes From, Inc. (WFCF) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.40, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.40
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.45
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.33
long-run
Ann. covariance
101218.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MI and WFCF?

On 3 years of weekly data the MI/WFCF correlation comes out at 0.40, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.45 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.33, and annualized covariance runs at 101218.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, WFCF places #11 of the 32 assets tracked against MI. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months WFCF outperformed by 20.7 percentage points (-10.3% for MI against +10.4% for WFCF). Note the risk asymmetry: MI runs 77.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MI vs WFCF: side by side

MI (NFT Limited Class A)WFCF (Where Food Comes From, Inc.)
1-year return-10.3%+10.4%
5-year return-99.5%+0.4%
Volatility (ann.)4443.9%57.1%
Beta vs S&P 5008.210.27
Max drawdown (3Y)-98.5%-49.1%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)45.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: WFCF -49.1% vs -98.5%Higher 5y return: WFCF +0.4% vs -99.5%
-94%0%+384%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MI · WFCF

Year-by-year returns

YearMIWFCF
2022-86.4%-3.7%
2023-66.2%-3.0%
2024-61.9%-2.3%
2025+13.3%-13.2%
2026-28.9%+15.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MI and WFCF good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.40, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MI and WFCF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between MI and WFCF is 0.40 over 3 years, 0.45 over 1 year and 0.33 over 5 years.

Is WFCF a good diversifier for MI?

A fair diversifier. At 0.40, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.40 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.40 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mi-vs-wfcf.json

MI vs WFCF: 3-year weekly correlation 0.40MI vs WFCF0.40

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MI vs WFCF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mi-vs-wfcf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mi-vs-wfcf/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MI correlations · WFCF correlations