PairBook
HomeINM › INM vs MI

INM vs MI: Correlation

How closely do InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (INM) and NFT Limited Class A (MI) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.58, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.58
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.94
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.51
long-run
Ann. covariance
435293.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are INM and MI?

Over the past 3 years, INM and MI moved with a correlation of 0.58, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.94) than the 3-year average (0.58). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.51, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 435293.2 %².

Few assets follow INM as closely as MI, which ranks #2 of 18 tracked partners. The last year tells two different stories: MI led by 26.1 percentage points, -36.4% for INM against -10.3% for MI. Note the risk asymmetry: MI runs 26.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

INM vs MI: side by side

INM (InMed Pharmaceuticals Inc.)MI (NFT Limited Class A)
1-year return-36.4%-10.3%
5-year return-99.9%-99.5%
Volatility (ann.)169.8%4443.9%
Beta vs S&P 5002.628.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-96.9%-98.5%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: INM -96.9% vs -98.5%Higher 5y return: MI -99.5% vs -99.9%
-94%0%+384%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. INM · MI

Year-by-year returns

YearINMMI
2022-93.8%-86.4%
2023-79.4%-66.2%
2024-43.0%-61.9%
2025-77.6%+13.3%
2026+34.9%-28.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are INM and MI good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.58 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between INM and MI?

The INM/MI correlation stands at 0.58 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.94, 5 years: 0.51), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MI a good diversifier for INM?

To a limited degree. At 0.58 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.58 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/inm-vs-mi.json

INM vs MI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.58INM vs MI0.58

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![INM vs MI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/inm-vs-mi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/inm-vs-mi/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: INM correlations · MI correlations