PairBook
HomeINTU › INTU vs MI

INTU vs MI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Intuit (INTU) and NFT Limited Class A (MI) carry a correlation of -0.30, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.30
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.22
long-run
Ann. covariance
-47531.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are INTU and MI?

Over the past 3 years, INTU and MI moved with a correlation of -0.30, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.36) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.22, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -47531.2 %².

Out of 45 assets tracked against INTU, MI lands near the bottom at #42. The last year tells two different stories: MI led by 36.6 percentage points, -46.9% for INTU against -10.3% for MI. Risk is not evenly split, since MI carries 122.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

INTU vs MI: side by side

INTU (Intuit)MI (NFT Limited Class A)
1-year return-46.9%-10.3%
5-year return-36.2%-99.5%
Volatility (ann.)36.2%4443.9%
Beta vs S&P 5000.708.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.2%-98.5%
Market cap$95.2B
P/E (trailing)21.0
Dividend yield1.39%0.00%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Higher yield: INTU 1.39% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: INTU -68.2% vs -98.5%Higher 5y return: INTU -36.2% vs -99.5%
-94%0%+384%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. INTU · MI

Year-by-year returns

YearINTUMI
2022-39.1%-86.4%
2023+61.8%-66.2%
2024+1.2%-61.9%
2025+6.1%+13.3%
2026-47.0%-28.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are INTU and MI good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between INTU and MI?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.30 over 3 years, with -0.36 over the last year and -0.22 over 5 years.

Is MI a good diversifier for INTU?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.30 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.30 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/intu-vs-mi.json

INTU vs MI: 3-year weekly correlation -0.30INTU vs MI-0.30

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![INTU vs MI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/intu-vs-mi.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/intu-vs-mi/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: INTU correlations · MI correlations