PairBook
HomeMDLZ › MDLZ vs RDDT

MDLZ vs RDDT: Correlation

Mondelez International (MDLZ) and Reddit (RDDT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.20
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-358.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are MDLZ and RDDT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of MDLZ and RDDT correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.20) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives n/a, with an annualized covariance of -358.7 %².

RDDT is close to the least connected end of MDLZ's tracked universe, ranking #36 of 40. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months MDLZ outperformed by 31.7 percentage points (+4.6% for MDLZ against -27.1% for RDDT). The rolling one-year correlation stayed in a tight band between -0.35 and -0.18 over the past three years, which points to a structural rather than episodic relationship. One caveat on sizing: RDDT is 3.7 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

MDLZ vs RDDT: side by side

MDLZ (Mondelez International)RDDT (Reddit)
1-year return+4.6%-27.1%
5-year return+14.7%n/a
Volatility (ann.)20.5%75.2%
Beta vs S&P 5000.032.59
Max drawdown (3Y)-29.0%-61.4%
Market cap$79.7B$29.6B
P/E (trailing)22.936.1
Dividend yield3.17%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesCommunication Services
Lower P/E: MDLZ 22.9 vs 36.1Higher yield: MDLZ 3.17% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MDLZ -29.0% vs -61.4%
-49%0%+10%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). MDLZ · RDDT

Year-by-year returns

YearMDLZRDDT
2022+2.9%
2023+11.2%
2024-15.3%
2025-7.0%+40.6%
2026+18.0%-33.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are MDLZ and RDDT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, MDLZ and RDDT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between MDLZ and RDDT?

The MDLZ/RDDT correlation stands at -0.23 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.20, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is RDDT a good diversifier for MDLZ?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.23, MDLZ and RDDT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/mdlz-vs-rddt.json

MDLZ vs RDDT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23MDLZ vs RDDT-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![MDLZ vs RDDT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/mdlz-vs-rddt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/mdlz-vs-rddt/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: MDLZ correlations · RDDT correlations